Kevin, I hope you know you don't have a monopoly on virture? You wasted no time in demurring to Ron Paul supporters as "Paulbots" and yet you mention something about etiquette. You cannot have it both ways.
I will answer your question head on since you apparently have no respect for Dr Ron Paul or any of his supporters.
First of all, from the very outset you and most all of the townhall.com writers have not given any respect to Dr Paul the man who is a Republican candidate for the Presidency of the United States. Most recently, he has been excluded from the New Hampshire debates. In your opinion and most of the Medias opinion he is a non essential candidate.
It is because most of Dr Paul's supporters have seen how you and the others have tried to smear and slander Dr Paul and even prevent him from getting his message out. The media continues to subsidize all of the so called Top Tier candidates with millions of dollars worth of Free air time and we already know that you and some of the other contributors on Townhall.com have been getting together to try and come up with ways that you can use your influence to keep Dr Paul from getting his message out and preventing the American people from hearing what he has to say. You call it narrowing the field.
Just remember that when we see you and your Neocon buddies trying to play dirty we call you on it and you do not like it. We know who and what you are. We are Americans and we will not take marching orders from you or the media.
By the way, we didnt take our marching orders from King George during the Revolution either!!
This is a little bit different though because this is the Ron Paul Revolution!! LOL :O)) |
|
Why is it spamming to reply to the lies and smears you post here against an honorable man, Kevin? When it comes to rudeness you show quite a bit of it yourself. You don't like people getting onto you? Knock off the cheapshots.
"It would behoove the editors of the most prominent conservative online and broadcast outlets to take notice of what these voters have to say."
You should follow your own advice instead of being a hypocrite. What you wrote above applies to those of us who support Ron Paul more than it does to you people. Claiming to be a Christian won't protect you from having the rest of us point out your dishonesty. You are every bit as bad as the people you complain about.
"It was cute when we got on board with President Bush; it was fine that we handed him the election in Ohio and thus the nation in 2004. But in 2008 we are supposed to let the talking heads, and "new media elites" tell us to ignore certain issues when we cast a ballot."
Chuck Baldwin can answer you lament with this.
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin417.htm
"Bonus exit question: Before the end of the day Sunday - how many Ron Paul spammers will leave comments there?"
That depends on you, Kevin and the number of asinine replies you and the others post. If you stop here I doubt if this thread will go much further. If you post a lot of stupid, lying stuff, then it will be long thread.
|
|
So here we are...the post is not even cold yet, and as predicted, the Ron Paul fast response bloggers are on it.
Thanks for proving Kevin right. Count this as asinine reply 1. |
|
the gauntlet....
"That depends on you, Kevin and the number of asinine replies you and the others post."
So, if you AND everyone else totally agrees with paul, like 100%, all is well.
BUT, if you OR anyone disagrees with anything paul stands for, ***WATCH OUT!!!***
Heaven knows, we've seen it EVERY SINGLE TIME paul has been mentioned...
And, you've been quite kind... "Spam!" Huh! More like blood running in the streets when anyone dares disagree with paul or his "f-o-l-l-o-w-e-r-s."
Here's the second bonus exit question: How many spammers will call me a "ron paul hater?" (No one EVER accused a paulist of being all that bright or logical.)
|
|
spammed and called all sorts of egregious names, more than any other TH poster, so I think I should get asinine post #1. :-)
Just 'cause you got there FIRST... Geesh! :-)
|
|
There you go again, taking something out of context.
"So, if you AND everyone else totally agrees with paul, like 100%, all is well."
Nowhere did I write this. Instead the post is about the crap Kevin writes, i.e., "paul pots", etc. I don't agree with Paul 100%. It is more like 80%. On the other hand, I agree with the rest of the GOP candidates only 20% of the time.
"And, you've been quite kind... "Spam!" Huh! More like blood running in the streets when anyone dares disagree with paul or his "f-o-l-l-o-w-e-r-s."
I see you didn't waste anytime coming over here.
=========
"Count this as asinine reply 1."
joinmo, agreed, but you'll have to split this dubious distinction with Anne, and not for the reason she lists. She has done her share of name calling.
|
|
I bow to your experience. Besides, I only got three lines of response. They "love" you far more than me.
This whole Paul thing has begun to reek of Ross Perot helping elect Hillary's husband back in 1992. I have to wonder if the Clinton's are backing another stalking horse...
Call me when the Black Helicopters roll. |
|
|
...I'd rather prefer Paultards. It seems very appropiate. |
|
that I was addressing YOU?
NO YOU DID NOT!
Wanna know why? Because I was NOT addressing you, and I never said YOU said anything...
Actually, if you could read, you'd see that I was addressing (in my first post) KMC!
Now, was THAT too difficult for you?
Cheers! :-)
|
|
You quoted me and that is good enough for a response from me.
=======
RuyDiaz
I didn't know that you were fan of "Wonkette"? |
|
It truly is amazing.
I have had pro-con discussions and debates about Rudy, Mitt, McCain, Thompson, and Huckabee... And not one time .. NOT ONE .. did I ever encounter the blind hostility that I've witnessed, not to mention being the brunt of, as I have with the paulists.
In fact, several months ago one paulist posted to me, "... working on finding you..."
They are one curious, strange, outrageous group.
|
|
I never even read your first post...
Nice try though! :-)
|
|
|
you're lying. Knight of Bwaaa does have a point. It really is fun to watch you thrash about when you get caught in traps of your on making. |
|
are YOU gonna get it now!
You better hope they don't find out where you live because you'd find 800000000 ronpaul signs stuck in your front lawn! (At least your lawn will be very well aerated by the time you take out all the stakes.) LOL
And that's not to mention the 2500 ronpaul stickers they'll put on your car.
|
|
|
|
When it comes to spinning and going off on a tangent (you quoted me, whaaa whaaa whaaa, and their usual name calling) they are like demo/libs on steroids.
Rationally and reasonably discuss and issue... NEVER GONNA HAPPEN!
|
|
Sunday, December, 30, 2007 8:16 AM
You even left the quotation marks around my sentence.
This is like shooting fish in a barrel. :D |
|
|
|
It was at the bottom of your post..which is why it caught my eye.... But you're right on that...
I stand corrected...
|
|
(from wnd.com):
"There is no New Hampshire GOP presidential debate scheduled for Jan. 6. The event was officially canceled three weeks ago. Ron Paul was, indeed, invited, but never committed to attending before the event was canceled because of the close proximity with the ABC event." |
|
|
Anne and in return I'll withdraw my comment accusing you of lying. |
|
Could hardly wait for knight of boo-hoo to show up (which he a-l-w-a-y-s does) with his vast abundance of wit, vocabulary, eloquence, articulation, and oh yeah, intelligence!
I'm glad he's learned the word "crackpot" because he at least NOW he knows a two-syllable word! That's an improvement!
|
|
it is you that becomes spittle-laced, red-faced, about-to-burst-a-blood-vessel, whenever the good doctor I'd brought up...
|
|
you should have asked is:
"will ignorance be intelligence?"
"knowledge" or "wisdom" would have also solved your non-sequitor dilemma... |
|
Here's an old slogan for the "muscle head revolution". "Believe, obey, fight!" It fits them.
What KMC and some of the others want us to do is to sit in the corner quietly while they proceed to engage in all sorts of dishonorable conduct. What is worse is that the things we are accused of are the things they engage in themselves. All one has to do is to read some of the other threads about the other candidates to see some real nastiness that rivals anything found on the Daily Kos or Little Green Fascists for that matter. |
|
(or NOT!) For some reason I just seem to have some kind of POWER over this hate filled lunatic...
All he has to do is see "Anne writes:" and he goes absolutely BAll-IS-TIC!!!
You get it on your columns and blogs, but let me tell you... I get it on everyone's column and/or blog... (Do you think it's something I said? Like I disagree with paul's foreign policy??)
I'm tellin' ya, knight of boo-hoo and the other paulists are like wild eyed left-wing lunatics on steroids!!!! (But, I have to admit, it is fun to watch. LOL)
|
|
Some of the Ron Paul supporters are very angry and racist. Everyday when I see those home-made, handwritten, Ron Paul signs and I want to toss my cookies.
I don't question if Mr. Paul is a honorable man. In fact, I agree with many of his points, EXCEPT the WAR ON TERROR. I respectfully disagree with him on that issue. Notice the word respectfully.
I have a question for the Ron Paul Supporters. If he is perfect presidential candidate; why don't you put your money where your mouth is? Support him by raising MORE money!
Here is the answer why no one will do it: You know DEEP DOWN he does not have a snowball chance in hell to win ANYTHING.
|
|
others want us to do is to sit in the corner quietly...."
Really?
Well, as usualy, you and knight of boo-hoo aren't even close...
What would be nice however, would be IF any of the paulists could possibly have a DISCUSSION and/DEBATE about paul's policies.
EVERYONE ELSE seems to be able to do it without assuming that if one disagrees then one automatically hates that person with whom they disagree.
And, get this!!!!!! There are people out here, who are JUST as BRIGHT and INTELLIGENT as the paulists, and some who are most likely BRIGHTER and MORE INTELLIGENT than paul and his paulists, who disagree.
IF, which is obviously the case, you cannot DISCUSS or DEBATE paul's policies without immediately calling people names and using ad homenim attacks, then you have NOTHING... ABSOLUTELY, WITHOUT A DOUBT N-O-T-H-I-N-G!!!!!
It's just one temper tantrum after another!
|
|
"I don't question if Mr. Paul is a honorable man. In fact, I agree with many of his points, EXCEPT the WAR ON TERROR. I respectfully disagree with him on that issue. Notice the word respectfully."
Been there, done that! I've even said, numerous times, that I agree with many of his DOMESTIC policies! It's the "EXCEPT (the WAR ON TERROR") part that they're gonna go after you with.
See, if you aren't a 100% paul follower, then you're a paul HATER!
And "respectfully" isn't going to mean a thing.
|
|
"EVERYONE ELSE seems to be able to do it without assuming that if one disagrees then one automatically hates that person with whom they disagree."
Not "everyone else". The threads about Paul on this blog alone show that not to be true. In fact, this thread will work starting with the initial post.
"And, get this!!!!!! There are people out here, who are JUST as BRIGHT and INTELLIGENT as the paulists, and some who are most likely BRIGHTER and MORE INTELLIGENT than paul and his paulists, who disagree."
That there are, but they are few here, save this. Paul is a lot more intelligent than his detractors. That is not the same as saying his detractors are stupid, but most of them are, in my opinion, though I think ignorant might be a better term.
|
|
|
I find it funny that on another thread KMC complained about evangelicals not getting any respect or words to that effect. Well, there are rationalevangelicals like Chuck Baldwin and there are dispensationalists like John Hagee and KMC. Unfortunately, most people associate dispensationalism with all evangelicals and that is the reason why people like Kevin are looked upon as ignorant snake handlers. Most folks aren't really interested in bringing on the rapture in the hope that Jesus will wisk them away while the rest of us are killed. |
|
where I admitted that I hated paul!!!!
I might have said I thought he was a bit of a nut case, but I never said I hated him....
Heck, I don't even hate you. I think you're a fool and an idiot, and I suspect you have some really major control issues, and heaven forbid you're married because I would suspect you'd be a real control freak with you wife (and please let there not be children under your control...because there would be some very damaged souls....)
And, okay, I'll admit that I do chuckle when, as KMC says, "you that becomes spittle-laced, red-faced, about-to-burst-a-blood-vessel, whenever the good doctor I'd brought up..." and chuckling probably isn't nice....
But I certainly don't hate you...
|
|
HATES everyone who isn't a paul L-O-V-E-R!!!!
boo-hoo has called each of us who are not "paulists" a myriad of "names" such as "Huckser" above. Must mean he hates us and Huckabee...
Poor pathetic paulist... knight of boo-boo.
I just hope I'm not within 500 miles of boo-hoo (and the other paulists,) when someone ELSE gets the nomination... and when someone ELSE gets elected pres.
These paulists are so crazy, I'm wondering if, for the first time, we'll actually have a "revolution" of sorts when paul is NOT NOMINATED..
Ummmmm?????
So long, hate mongers. :-)
|
|
You are the pot caling the kettle black.
You spam for Huck, Spam against Romney and Paul.
You even decided to 'Hate' an entire team, because one player is having a child out of wed lock.
Like I said you are a liberal. You have an agenda that you want the government to cater too. You will use lies, fear and smear to push that agenda. Just please do not claim to be a Christian.
Happy New Year |
|
|
...it's not yours to deface, thank you. |
|
...for KMC and Anne.
"Ron Beats Rudy?
New Hampshire could surprise a lot of people.
BY ANDREW CLINE
Sunday, December 30, 2007 12:01 a.m. EST"
http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110011060
He'll do better than third place in NH.
"These paulists are so crazy, I'm wondering if, for the first time, we'll actually have a "revolution" of sorts when paul is NOT NOMINATED.."
You must have heard David Horowitz. He seems to think Paul supporters are subversive. There's a revolution, alright, but it is a peaceful one.
|
|
That's true, he doesn't care for Rudy, but I bet having to make a choice between Paul or Giuliani Kevin will vote for the cross dresser. After all, he's much better than Paul on "national security" issues and if Hagee or someone like that tells him to vote for Rudy Kevin will comply. That is what it means to be a combination religious fanatic/neocon ideologue.
Hell, I bet he would vote for Hillary over Paul if it came down to it. |
|
"how many Ron Paul spammers will leave comments there?"
Enough to prove you right and more than you ever wanted in the first place!
What do I win? |
|
"I'm tellin' ya, knight of boo-hoo and the other paulists are like wild eyed left-wing lunatics on steroids!!!! (But, I have to admit, it is fun to watch. LOL)"
---------------
Hello Anne. I'm waiting for you to call ME a left wing lunatic. I dare ya.
While you're at it, I guess you should call these veterans the same. http://www.ronpaul2008.com/veterans/
Then, how about long-time conservative, Chuck Muth?
“the two American political figures Ron Paul strikes me as being the most similar to are Thomas Jefferson and Barry Goldwater.” – Chuck Muth
And then there is Judge Andrew Napolitano.
He describes Congressman Ron Paul as the "Thomas Jefferson of our day."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8QwTKKSvR8
I guess BARRY GOLDWATER, JR. is a "wild eyed left-wing lunatics on steroids" too, eh Anne?
“America is at a crossroads, we have begun to stray from our traditions and must get back to what has made us the greatest nation on earth or we will lose much of the freedom we hold dear. Ron Paul stands above all of the other candidates in his commitment to liberty and to America.” "Leading America is difficult, and I know Ron Paul is the man for the job,” - Barry Goldwater, Jr.
I have many, many more. Would you like for me to post them?
|
|
Since when did believing in our Constitution and the rule of law, become considered "lunacy." Shame on those of you who are buying the media's schtick. I have seen many of you on here griping about the loss of state's rights, a runaway Supreme Court who thinks that the Constitution is a living document and makes unconstitutional acts such as Kelo, the amnesty that both parties seem bound and determined to cram down our throats, while imprisoning Ramos and Compean, federal government spending out of control and on and on.
And yet you stand here and bemoan the ONE candidate who has the courage to stand up to all the special interests and lobbyists for US and our country. What is wrong with you? Have you forgotten the principles of traditional conservatism?:
- Limited constitutional government
- Personal privacy
- Personal responsibility
- Fiscally responsible government
- Strong national defense
- Individual liberty
Only you can answer the question of whether you want to allow our country to keep sinking down into the last steps of collectivism/totalitarianism. Or, if you want to start turning it around. If you choose to continue to bury your head in the sand and miss the one chance we have, then you will have to explain to your children why you did not act, when there was still a chance to save our country. |
|
For the sake of this question, I'm going to pretend that RP goes into the convention looking like a frontrunner.
Ok, here's the big Q: How many of you seriously think that once they get to the convention, that the GOP will give RP the nod?
Here's what I know..... It ain't gonna happen! |
|
What's your point? Are you saying that the heads of the Republican Party are so sold out that they will not allow an honest convention?
Is that what you are saying? |
|
He doesn't have one other than a misplaced belief that Thompson is some sort of conservative.
Con4Fred is a fredhead, which makes him a deadhead. |
|
Have you ever heard of the brokered convention?
If you have then you know exactly what I'm talking about. I know for a fact that the GOP will NOT give RP the nod. That's just fine with me because RP is a dangerous pick! |
|
"That's just fine with me because RP is a dangerous pick!"
No, that's not the reason. They'll try to stop him because his isn't a CFR globalist like Fred Thompson.
How's things in Iowa? You get Fred's bus unstuck from that snow storm? Fred's counting on you, the ignoratti, to help get him through this primary. |
|