What's Hot | Search |

Get Your Personal
On-Air Report Here

blog advertisingis good for you
Friday, December 28, 2007
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 11:46 AM


...owned part of stem-cell research company...

Question: Which is worse? (Please answer in comment section)
a.) Being compensated for speeches made to diabetes research company...
b.) Partial ownership of adamant advocate stem-cell research company...



View in ascending order View in descending order
_SeekerOfTruth_ writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:10 PM
Kevin you are an idot
Do you even know what a stem cell is. Do you know where you can get them from?
Did you know you spew a few thousand of them when you sneeze
rjs46 writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:15 PM
blind trust?
How is it an issue? That was a very misleading headline. That is worse than accusing me of supporting big tobacco because I have an index fund of the S&P 500. I think the point may have been to to enlighten some of the huckabigots who only read anti-Romney pieces to salve their closed mindedness since the politico article was clearly anti-huck.
Dave J. writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:20 PM
blowing smoke
To me neither one of these is really an issue.

Do you know all the companies that are imbedded in your mutual funds? 401k? I sure don't. So to say that Romney "partially owned" a company is a real stretch.

Similarly, if Huckabee was interested in a company for its work with diabetes (understadable given his past health history), that doesn't necessarily mean he espouses all the research a company does, especially considering how many different interests many of these huge companies have.

So, if I watch NBC TV, who is owned by GE, I personally am contributing to acid rain in the northeast because GE make equipment that goes in certain plants that contribute to it? Likewise, I drive a car, which uses gas, which may have originated from a terror-sponsoring state, ergo, I am a personal sponsor of terror? Give me a break.
Eichendorff writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:24 PM
The issue...
...is not stem-cell research per se, but rather the type of research this company did. Romney supports stem-cell research as long as it is not embryonic. President Bush's view has won the day, and you can just hear the left gnashing their teeth. Mitt Romney's view matches the President's.
Larq writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:27 PM
Disappointing
Kevin,

The answer is clearly "a", because "b" is not even an option. This is undeniably true, in spite of your transparent attempt to smear Romney with a question you shouldn't even be asking.

Do you not understand what a blind trust is? The relevant quote from the linked article is "Unbeknownst to [Romney], he had between $100,000 and $250,000 in stock in Novo Nordisk in a blind trust that was made public this summer." Please focus on "unbeknownst" and "blind trust."

If the owner of a blind trust has control over the investments, then it can hardly be called a blind trust, yet that is what you are implying. Your comment makes as much sense as me saying "Kevin McCullough supports abortion", and then justifying it by saying that you pay taxes and some tax dollars go to Planned Parenthood.
Zach writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:30 PM
Are you naive or disingenuous?
Romney "owned" stock in the company through a blind trust over which he had zero decision making ability. He found out about his ownership from the same newspaper articles the rest of us did. He set up that blind trust to prevent any conflicts of interest for his presidential run.

Huckabee on the other hand took money from the company with his eyes wide open.

I have a difficult time believeing you don't know this story so it leaves one to wonder...

Question: Which is worse? (Please answer in comment section)
a.) Deliberately leaving out critical information...
b.) Leaving out information because you are unable/too busy to read the whole article you sourced...
Baby Karl writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 12:36 PM
Correct Answer is...
BOTH ACCUSATIONS ARE UTTERLY STUPID AND INSIPID...

And to the commenter who claimed I was smearing one of the candidates...

Did you say the same thing to Hugh this morning when he took the equally cheap shot at Huck over the issues listed above?

The dude spoke about diabetes, weight loss, and health improvement...
Mark writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 1:30 PM
Originality
Kevin,

Each night you must pray for Hewitt's health and safety, because without him and his commentary, you apparently have nothing to say. Please, get your own life on TownHall and at Muscle Beach.
Baby Karl writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 1:43 PM
Its called fact checking mark...
Because it was the analyst who shall not be named that stated that anyone who disagreed with him on substance - should not be trusted...
David writes: Friday, December, 28, 2007 2:58 PM
TELEPHONE POLL vs. the speck
Kevin,
I was a Romney supporter till I actually researched his record.
Thank you for pointing out the hypocrisy of Hugh Hewitt (it's NAUSEATING), Ann Coulter and the other Mitt-puppets!!! While they're straining to find any minute dirt on Huck, they're ignoring GAPING FLAWS with the liberal-judge-appointing, taxes-as-bad-as-Arkansas, the-judges-made-me-do-same-sex-marriage, flip-flopping Romney!
Since Townhall has no Huckabee supporters, I'm thankful you at least have the guts to point out the obvious. It gives me encouragement that Hugh has not yet created a total censorship at Townhall (but I'm not holding my breath).
This is one dumb sheep who is learning to disagree with the New Media as much as I do the Old.
Goldwater writes: Monday, December, 31, 2007 1:33 PM
Blind Trust
If you do not know what it means, it takes 2 seconds to find out.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

 

blog advertising is good for you
Archives
Blog Search:




Blogroll
PREMIUM BLOGS
Andrew Sullivan
BatesLine
Ben Shapiro
Beyond The News
Blogs For Bush
BlueStateConservatives
Broken Masterpieces
Captain's Quarters
Cheese and Crackers
Communists For Kerry
The Corner (NRO)
Daou Report
David Limbaugh
Dawn Patrol
EasonGate
Filling Up Space
Fire Ant Gazette
Front Page Magazine
GOP Bloggers
Happy Husband
HillaryWatch
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
John Huang
Kaus Files
Kevin McCullough
Kerry Spot
LaShawn Barber's Corner
Lileks
Little Green Footballs
MarriageWatch
Michelle Malkin
Northshore Politics
Obama Factor
Pardon My English
Powerline
Rabes Ramblings
Radio Blogger
Ramblings Journal
Ray Pritchard
Real Clear Politics
Red State
Saint Kansas
Scrappleface
Sexless In The City
SlantPoint
Townhall C-Log
Volokh Conspiracy
Vox Popoli
Weintraub
WizBANG
Worldthreats
Zorn's Notebook

CPAC BLOGS
Ace of Spades HQ
Alarming News
Ankle Biting Pundits
GOP Bloggers
HughHewitt.com
JunkYardBlog
Kevin McCullough
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Miscellaneous Objections
Outside The Beltway
Politics from Left to Right
Redstate
Terrorism Unveiled
The American Mind
The National Debate
TheAgitator.com
Townhall.com
Winds of Change.NET
Wizbang
Wonkette


GODBLOGGERS
Adrian Warnock
Al Mohler
Better Living
Ethos
Evangelical Outpost
It Takes A Church
John Mark Reynolds
La Shawn Barber
Mark D. Roberts
Normal Rockstar
Ray Pritchard
Rhett Smith
Roman Catholic Blog
Stand to Reason
Steve Camp
Stones Cry Out
Summa Aesthetica
The Anchoress

MILBLOGGERS
Argghhh!
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Black Five
Centcom
Counterterrorism Blog
Froggy Ruminations
Hooah
Howdy
Hurl
Law and Ordnance
Major K
Mudville Gazette
Smash
Training for Eternity