Friday, February 29, 2008
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough
at
2:03 PM
 A Choice Not a Child! Look into those eyes, the little nose, the beautiful dark hair. Since 1973 - we've thrown away 60 million just like her - sometimes in pieces in the dumpsters of "women's health clinics" and the soiled utility closet of "Christ Hospital" in Barack Obama's suburban Chicago. Now the father who left her in the back seat of a cab is being hunted like a rabid dog. But hey, he was just exercising his "right" to "choose" to leave his responsibility behind him. And thanks to the modern feminists of the 1960's that morphed into the early 1973's pro-abortion movement, this man today is just living up to their mindset - a truly feminized "man!"
But why should the Government be required to provide birth control?
Whatever happened to personal responsibility... like not doing things YOU'RE not prepared to endure the consequences of?
What's wrong with being accountable for one's actions? |
|
|
|
"Wow the - I had abortion crowd
lined up quick... It usually takes you guys at least 24 hours or so to become outraged by legitimate comparisons... "
That was not legitimate comparison, that was just cr@p. Your best come back to those who disagree is to say they had abortions. You are sick and stupid.
|
|
|
The pro lifers I know (myself included) would love to see adoption law changed. Unfortunately in the non-judgmental world of the left it takes years for parental rights to be forcibly terminated. Children who would have found homes easily as infants or toddlers wind up stuck in the system due to these delays and second chances that are inexplicably given. As for women who want to voluntarily surrender their children, that is easier although not without problems. That process should be streamlined some as well. |
|
If the so called "pro life" really cared about children, they would (1) make adoption laws current and realistic so more Mothers could seriously consider adoption; (2) provide birth control to stop unwanted pregnancies in the first place; and (3) make sure every child had adequate healh care insurance.
But, of course, you "pro life"ers are against ALL of those things. So you, really don't give a darn about children, only abortions. |
|
|
lined up quick... It usually takes you guys at least 24 hours or so to become outraged by legitimate comparisons... |
|
When has McCullough ever concerned himself with anything so mundane as accuracy?
If his hysterical rhetoric doesn't attract readers and listeners, he will have to take that job standing outside of Mcdonalds in a chicken suit. |
|
McCullough, were you in a hurry today or what? This piece is really bad. First, if you have documentable information that ANY medical facility, abortion clinic or the Mayo Clinic, is discarding human remains in a dumpster, then by all means take action, as this is illegal. I suspect, however, you have just treated us to a bit of screaming hyperbole intended to rile up the troops, which is your job.
Second, infant abandonment certain did not begin with the passing of Roe v Wade but is as old as people. Literature and human history provide us with countless examples. Having a baby you don't want would surely be the first predictor of doing away with that baby. Just about every week my local paper runs the story of a baby being killed because it cried or a toddler being killed because it soiled itself or said "wouldn't mind". This babies are beaten, suffocated, strangled, thrown against the wall, stomped to death, whipped with electrical cords, and scalded in boiling hot water.
You and I may disagree on this, but personally I would rather see a six-weeks' embryo killed than a three year-old child screaming, "No, Mama, don't, please, please, don't!".
|
|
|