The losers in the hotly contested issue of changing the historic definition of marriage to suddenly include all kinds of various definitions in California evidently do not understand the authority of Constitutional rule.

The Supreme Court of a State can not override specificity in the document that they themselves are organized by.

The ruling the California Supreme Court only months ago passed was that the state legislative measure passed a few years ago defining marriage along historic lines was not protected in the language of the state's constitution specifically.

The voters despite being outspent nearly 17 to 1 in terms of financial, celebrity, and media influenced resources decided against all of those elites and decided that the Constitution would be amended to define marriage as it has always been defined... a union of one man and one woman.

They even did this despite the fact that the homosexual advocates on the other side sent hit squads to the homes of major donors to the Prop 8 measure to intimidate, assault, and manipulate into submission on the issue.

The Constitution is accountable to the will of the people, the Supreme Court is accountable to the Constitution, the legislature is sometimes accountable to the Supreme Court, and certainly the people are subject to the legislature.

Those that have now lost (AGAIN) to the will of the people of California are attempting to rewrite the entirety of the accountability in the state's code.

They will lose - because the people have the right to define marriage as it has always been defined.

And its NOT discrimination to do so...