I'm struck by the strangeness of the tone the NYPost took with this piece on Katie Couric addressing the National Press Club.
"Penchant for dating younger men?" Usually code for... well you know...
Is that supposed to be a slam, or an innuendo as to her predilictions?
I'm not really sure - but the craziest thing of all is the stupidity of Dan Rather quoted at the end:
"I don't believe Ms. Couric knows all the facts," Rather told The Post yesterday. "When they come out, she may well change her mind."
No Dan, when she said you erred egregiously - she was accurate. When you decided to use fraudulent sources, in an election cycle, to in essence make up the "proofs" of the claims that you intended to turn the outcome of an election cycle on - you did err.
Just because you have no integrity - doesn't make Katie Couric ignorant. And you calling her ignorant doesn't make it so either...