If the most important thing in a free and democratic society is to be able to hear from the candidates who are seeking your vote so that you can make the most informed choice possible, isn't then incumbent upon the candidates to allow you to see their ideas side by side?
Is there a more democratic act that can be done than to allow the give and take of freely formed - but opposing ideas to be judged by the merits of the voters who will vote for them?
Hillary doesn't much believe so. Only willing to do two debates - on the very low rated cable channel NY1. Why can't she allow all New Yorkers - one's with satellite service, and broadcast only reception to be able to hear her ideas?
After all if she is so far ahead that there's "no way she can lose," what's the problem?
John Spencer is a good man, and he ran a nearly all democratic town from bankruptcy to prosperity - as a Republican, and he has the backing of both the GOP and Conservative parties in the state of New York.
What's Hillary afraid of?
Chicken?
New to The MuscleHead Revolution? Thanks for stopping by, we'd like to say thanks by offering a free subscription to our monthly publication - The MuscleHead Magnet. It assists you in "muscling up the mind" and "building up the brain" and is delivered free each month.Simply shoot us an e-mail and put "Magnet" in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET THE HOT NEW BOOK: MUSCLEHEAD REVOLUTION: Overturning Liberalism through Commonsense Thinking
MYSPACE: http://myspace.com/muscleheadkmc
THE "MAGNET" NEWSLETTER: musclehead@wmca.com
THE DAILY "PUNCH" COMMENTARY: Updated Daily
LISTEN LIVE TO KEVIN MCCULLOUGH: Weekdays 2-4p EST, 5-7p EST
THE COMPLETE KEVIN MCCULLOUGH PODCAST: CLICK HERE