What's Hot | Search |

Get Your Personal
On-Air Report Here

blog advertisingis good for you
Thursday, January 11, 2007
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 12:00 PM

The President did seem to make one thing clear, in his clearly uneasy address to the nation last night. He's not messing around with Iran.

Some reports read his remarks as grave...

My sources in the Pentagon say this is what they think it really means:

1. He is putting external military pressure on Iran. Note that we will soon have three carrier task forces in the region. Admiral Fallon, the new CENTCOM commander, is known for his use of naval forces to sway geopolitical pressure. Also, watch for overflights by more U.S. aircraft from places like Diego Garcia, Afghanistan and Iraq. Some are drones looking at Iranian military and nuclear positions. Many subtle activities are underway and Iran is very much aware otherwise it wouldn't have staged three major military maneuvers in 2006 or continued to shake its arms rattle at the U.S.
 
2. The U.S. is aggressively going after Iranians inside Iraq. We have bombed numerous sites along the Iraq-Iran border, e.g., Iranian consulate in Irbil. We have captured al Qods (Iranian Revolutionary Guards) et al inside Iraq and exposed them to media light and used their information for follow-up action. No longer will the Iranians have freedom to maneuver in that country. We are building a case.
 
3. SEC. STATE Rice will be in the Gulf this weekend to garner diplomatic pressure on Iran. There will be new economic pressures as well.
 
4. I expect more clandestine actions to assist Iranian resistance groups as well.
 
Is it working? Perhaps. Oil prices have dropped 11% in two weeks. It's not just because warm weather has kept northern hemisphere consumption down. No, the markets understand that Iran will exercise more wisdom regarding its oil policy and the flow from Gulf states will continue.
Food for thought...


View in ascending order View in descending order
drt writes: Thursday, January, 11, 2007 12:58 PM
Bush to Bomb Iran
Your Pentagon source(s) are not giving you all there is. Much more is going on. Both Israel and the US are planning (and have been practicing)military maneuvers, never seen before in history.

Little did we know that Jimmy Carter's lies and cowardice in dealing with Iran and the deposement of Shah would have such horrific consequences some 30 years later.
sNapdigger writes: Thursday, January, 11, 2007 1:07 PM
Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran
Please inform me how many Iranians you think should be slaughtered to make us feel better about ourselves.

Tell me also whether bombing Iran and slaughtering its people will in fact stop them from getting nukes, instead of proving to them that they need nukes (to protect themselves from people like you who want to slaughter them).

I mean, Comrades, I appreciate your desire to eliminate the undesirables, but you know, I tend to think that committing genocide isn't something you should take lightly. Maybe it's me, and I'll eventually come around to your way of thinking and root for mass murder of Iranians.
one hot minute writes: Thursday, January, 11, 2007 1:34 PM
Snapdigger, you sound confused

Snapdigger,

It's fair to state that you misinterpret what is going on.

Nobody is advocating slaughtering the Iranian people.
On the contrary, the Iranian people are our friends.
Any bombing mission would target identified nuclear proliferation facilities, in order to set back their program.

Our "enemy" is the wild and crazy fundamentalist factions within the Iranian government who threaten to wipe other sovereign states off the map.

celtic-dragon writes: Thursday, January, 11, 2007 1:38 PM
sNapdigger
Why do you think that an aerial campaign against Iran would lead to mass Iranian casualties? I strongly doubt that we would replay "Bomber Harris" and the Dresden raids of 1944. People engaged in wartime/military production or related activities are, in fact, legitimate targets. Fire bombing entire city neigborhoods is not considered a legitimate use of force. That is why we do the former...and not the latter.
sNapdigger writes: Thursday, January, 11, 2007 1:40 PM
ohm
"Any bombing mission would target identified nuclear proliferation facilities, in order to set back their program."

Which would merely delay them from getting nukes, not stop them, as well as proving once and for all that they *need* nukes.

So the only concrete result of such a bombing campaign would be the deaths of many innocent Iranians, plus turning the Iranian people (our "friends") permanently against us. Dumb and evil idea.
one hot minute writes: Thursday, January, 11, 2007 2:17 PM
Is Snapdigger OK with Iran having nukes?

Snapdigger,

Iran has promised to wipe other soverign states off the map. Therefore, we want to delay Iran from developing their nuclear program.
That's the point.

Just out of curiosity, what is your reason for not objecting to Iran having a sustainable nuclear program ?
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

 

blog advertising is good for you
Archives
Blog Search:




Blogroll
PREMIUM BLOGS
Andrew Sullivan
BatesLine
Ben Shapiro
Beyond The News
Blogs For Bush
BlueStateConservatives
Broken Masterpieces
Captain's Quarters
Cheese and Crackers
Communists For Kerry
The Corner (NRO)
Daou Report
David Limbaugh
Dawn Patrol
EasonGate
Filling Up Space
Fire Ant Gazette
Front Page Magazine
GOP Bloggers
Happy Husband
HillaryWatch
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
John Huang
Kaus Files
Kevin McCullough
Kerry Spot
LaShawn Barber's Corner
Lileks
Little Green Footballs
MarriageWatch
Michelle Malkin
Northshore Politics
Obama Factor
Pardon My English
Powerline
Rabes Ramblings
Radio Blogger
Ramblings Journal
Ray Pritchard
Real Clear Politics
Red State
Saint Kansas
Scrappleface
Sexless In The City
SlantPoint
Townhall C-Log
Volokh Conspiracy
Vox Popoli
Weintraub
WizBANG
Worldthreats
Zorn's Notebook

CPAC BLOGS
Ace of Spades HQ
Alarming News
Ankle Biting Pundits
GOP Bloggers
HughHewitt.com
JunkYardBlog
Kevin McCullough
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Miscellaneous Objections
Outside The Beltway
Politics from Left to Right
Redstate
Terrorism Unveiled
The American Mind
The National Debate
TheAgitator.com
Townhall.com
Winds of Change.NET
Wizbang
Wonkette


GODBLOGGERS
Adrian Warnock
Al Mohler
Better Living
Ethos
Evangelical Outpost
It Takes A Church
John Mark Reynolds
La Shawn Barber
Mark D. Roberts
Normal Rockstar
Ray Pritchard
Rhett Smith
Roman Catholic Blog
Stand to Reason
Steve Camp
Stones Cry Out
Summa Aesthetica
The Anchoress

MILBLOGGERS
Argghhh!
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Black Five
Centcom
Counterterrorism Blog
Froggy Ruminations
Hooah
Howdy
Hurl
Law and Ordnance
Major K
Mudville Gazette
Smash
Training for Eternity