I'm not sure why this story would make any Ron Paul supporter mad or want to comment. Ron Paul did an hour-long sit-down interview with Google back in early summertime, and he seemed to be well-recieved. If Google employees are making a lot of money and they're contributing to the candidate that they happened to like, I don't see how this might be some sort of "grand conspiracy" if Google has any spotty ties to the CIA.
Besides, if Paul's a CIA stooge, wouldn't he know more about government intelligence than the average American? :-) |
|
|
Besides, who listens to Alex Jones and takes him seriously? |
|
Considering there seems to be a lot of talk on the internet concerning white supremacists supporting Ron Paul I thought I would throw out a winning ticket.
(actually, I stole it from another blog) |
|
I didn't realize you were a truther. I thought you were simply another brain addled dispensationalist.
"C'mon snarkers let's get the crackpot party started!"
And you are just the crackpot of crackpots to lead it off. Come on now, you might as well get used to it. President Paul. :D |
|
I'm no raving Paul supporter, but you're just trying to attract those of enfeebled brain with claims that you know to be absurd. Weak, and lazy, and as far as I can tell, pointless.
RP can't help that he attracts nutcases who support him for the wrong reasons. He's the only candidate who's anti-establishment, and you have to admire that.
Maybe I'm missing something here, because I really like your columns. |
|
As I've said many times... I actually do agree with a great number of his views. His complete inability to recognize that people are attempting to kill us notwithstanding...
But it's frankly gotten to be sorta fun to see how mad the "enfeebled brains" get when the sainted St. Paul comes under criticism...
Truly one of the most amusing things to sit and watch... AND a very interesting study in humanity to boot.
Thanks for liking my columns - my desire for common sense will still be strongly evidenced in many ways. But when it comes to coverage of paulpot - just consider it my muse to blow off some steam for a day... heh! |
|
If you were trying to be reasonable you would quit lying and attempting to distort Paul's position. You have yet to give a source for the Soros lie. Not very "christian" of you.
From your biography:
"He advocates for such shocking things as absolute truth, as well as proper stewardship and integrity in the actions of our public leaders."
Sure you do and pigs fly. |
|
|
Out of curiosity I listen to a little bit of Crackpot Kevin's radio show today. He was trying to raise money to build some houses in Jamaica. Very commendable, assuming this isn't just another scam pulled by these guys. Far too often I have seen that the more someone wears his religion on his sleeve the more likely you are dealing with a someone running a scam. Anyway, I thought it was funny to want to build some housing while wanting at the same time to destroy so much of it along with the occupants in another area. Bloody minded indeed. |
|
...on television that fascism will come to America wearing robes and carrying a cross?
Man, he's REALLY trying hard to get that Republican nomination, isn't he?
If I recall the original quote, it was that when fascism comes to America it will come to us in the guise of anti-fascism.
|
|
Of Paul's platform occurred on Savage last night. The guest host, Wisebeck (sic) indicated RP advocates open borders; a quick visit to ronpaul2008.com, together with the good doctor's record, indicates otherwise. I couldn't get through to set the record straight.
Without the military bogged down in Iraq, wouldn't it be in a better position to respond quickly and overwhelmingly to Islamist threats? There is a reason Ron Paul gets such high reviews vis-a-vis his competitors from those with actual service backgrounds.
Rep. Paul recognizes the threat posed by bin Laden and company and voted to go after them in Afghanistan. Iraq, though, had nothing to do with 9-11, as George Bush has stated in response to a reporter's question.
On the homefront, what other candidate has a more effective plan to reduce the size and bumbling intrusiveness of government in our daily lives? World of difference between promising to reduce runaway spending and taking away Washington's ability to engage in it (gold standard). |
|
|
|
|
Whatever works to build up a good appetite for breakfast. KMC must be trying to make voters die laughing before the election season arrives for most of us. CIA? Who would have connected Google with the CIA before this? (ROFLMAO!) Kevin still won't make me die laughing before I can VOTE for Ron Paul! Win or no win, I have to vote for who will make the best President for the USA. That's Ron Paul from everything I've learned of their views on important issues. I may disagree with a small part of what he says. Most of what he says I'm in full agreement with so I will definately have to vote for him. The country could benefit from having a more frugal minded President such as Ron Paul would be. |
|
Look at the photo at the top of this page. Is this the face of a leader? Noooooooo!
To be fair, this photo is not exactly complimentry to him, but I have watched him in debates and have watched afew Youtube vids of him. One thing becomes abundantly clear if you watch him long enough. A leader he ain't! |
|
|
|
|
Most of us vote for a candidate on what he thinks, not what he looks like. |
|
|
|
"Look at the photo at the top of this page. Is this the face of a leader? Noooooooo!
To be fair, this photo is not exactly complimentry to him, but I have watched him in debates and have watched afew Youtube vids of him. One thing becomes abundantly clear if you watch him long enough. A leader he ain't!"
You could look like Brad Pitt but I would not vote for you because your brain is funny looking. Could you be any more shallow? It's people like you we have to thank for having Paris Hilton in our night news now-a-days. |
|
So what? I read a news story they posted and really don't care about who Duke may support. Fred, on the other hand, does have a say on what he does or fails to do as an individual. When he was a senator he was lousy on immigration. His chairmanship of the committee looking into the Clinton administration over the Chinese money scandal sucked and he voted to acquit Clinton of one of the charges made against him. Fred was also a lobbyist for Aristide of necklacing fame and a fund raiser for Scooter Libby, someone I consider disloyal. And there is good ole Fred's membership in the globalist CFR. I'll take Paul any day despite with a few questionable supporters over all the trash Fred has in his closet.
If I had more time I would love to see some of Fred's supporters, but I don't think he'll be in the race much longer, particularly if Matalin is running his campaign. |
|
He was the one who said that when fascism comes to America, it will come in the guise of anti-fascism.
"8. He, like me, is of the Austrian School of economics. We're the only ones who can actually explain the reason the economy is so screwed up right now. Cranks? Hardly. Go read Mises and Rothbard."
Most people would merely have written that Paul is a devotee of the Austrian School of Economics and left it at that.
That you felt the need to interject yourself into it with "we" and the pretentious "We're the only ones..." is yet again an indicator of a personality that is suffering from an acute ego problem.
My parents used to refer to this condition as "getting too big for your britches". I've long held that third parties and the people who belong to them place the ability to say "I told you so" far, far in importance moreso than actually winning anything substantive. |
|
|
Do you think Fred Thompson's face is prettier? I would think a 'pretty face' contest would come down to Mitt Romney vs John Edwards. Maybe that would explain why most of us vote on substance & issues over appearance. Anybody that holds their eyebrows up like Ron Paul is doing in the shown picture is going to look funny. It will wrinkle up the foreheads on nearly everybody old enough to run for President. |
|
...about Edwards over on Drudge and in the National Enquirer turns out to be accurate, I don't think we need concern ourselves with him anymore.
Cheating on a wife who has terminal cancer just doesn't play well with the home audience. |
|
He talks too much about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
He HAS to go! |
|
and the Bill of Rights... An AMERICAN PRESIDENT should stand for the Constitution! Any candidate who stalls at putting the USA First isn't fit to vote for the President of this country & should go run for office in the country they would put ahead of this country. Ron Paul sounds like our best choice for the President we need to elect.
Smaller government... More freedom... Ron Paul for President! |
|
Have any of you seriously watched a debate or the many youtube vids out there? RP is many things, but a leader he ain't.
Besides, I got some bad news for you folks, the GOP will never let him walk away with the nomination. But he will get a cabinet job out of it. |
|
"Have any of you seriously watched a debate or the many youtube vids out there? RP is many things, but a leader he ain't."
I can quote you above about Thompson, but he was a good actor in "The Hunt for the Red October". |
|