Tuesday, September 12, 2006
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough
at
4:40 PM
Well I already know that the Brangelina household is one that my children would never be welcomed at - but even if they were - would never be allowed to visit.
In the new edition of Esquire set to hit stores on Sept.19th, Brad Pitt (Mr. Jolie to those in the know) is interviewed about his current living arrangement. Based on the idea that its really no big whoop if he an Angelina are shaking up with no bond of marriage to secure their children's future - Pitt speaks as though he has life by the toe.
When asked about how he's going to raise his children, "I try not to stifle them in any way. If it's not hurting anyone, I want them to be able to explore. Sometimes that means they're quite rambunctious."
NO BRAD - that means they are a royal pain in everyone's backside.
Then sort of out of the blue he uncorks this gem from his great untapped mind, "Angie and I will consider tying the knot when everyone else in the country who wants to be married is legally able."
Most people assume he is speaking of redefining the institution of marriage to include homosexual unions. Something Jolie is expert on...
Some have also speculated that he perhaps meant siblings being able to sexually "explore" - again reference Jolie...
The trouble with Pitt is that in making these statements he is exposing himself for what he truly is - wicked and ignorant...
He is in essence saying...
1. He won't provide the security of a relationship with his child's mother in the context of what would be best for her - simply on the basis of his love for his child and her mother.
2. He believes the state of marriage is something so callous he can hold it hostage - for blackmail against the populous.
3. He foolishly believes that redefining the institution of marriage that society is being helped - where in every nation that has done it - the reverse has happened.
4. He refuses to recognize the truthful concept that already exists - every person in America is already allowed to marry...
Wicked and ignorant - Brad Pitt - the Associated Press' version of father of the year...
Silly and sad...
Mr. McCullough's comments prove full-well that this couple is "break(ing) any social mores or engaging in impropriety." is doing that very thing..That was part of his point..Anyone with basic reading skills or an understanding of history's precedent and Right and Wrong knows why..
If your children were "raised in the same manner" as Ms. Jolie and Mr. Pitt's I feel sorry for them..
Reams of historic and sociological study prove that children always fare better with a Father and Mother at home, particularly when they are committed under God, for life, as married people and committed to living their love "faithfully and for life.."
"Your" way, the way of shacking up and broken homes, gays raising a child, single parent homes or communes (The only other 'alternatives' to a Husband and Wife) saw their failure rate culminating in the 1960's.
Now maybe some single parents could be the exception to the above rule, but only in select circumstance where, for example, a Wife or Husband has been cheated on/and/or abandoned..or for Widows..Widowers..
God will always make a way in these things..Most of those families were never looking to raise a child alone, so, as victims, some, they are not at a moral fault and are different..
Others who mean well and raise a child alone-probably have been misinformed by media's pushing such a thing..
"definitive moral compass" exactly what does that mean for you?
Many corrupt world leaders did well in school too..
Those who live and teach the creed that marriage is "nothing, just a piece of paper" know nothing about it and should quit getting their moral "codes" from Oprah and gossip magazines..
Stop calling Mr. McCullough a "moron".He is not! He is entirely right, his analysis astute, and he is a credit to those making this case..
He has fought for the good and Godly values a long time, in print and on radio..
He makes it a point to not only seek promoting God's vision for marriage but to live it-He often talks about his love for his Bride..glowing tones, and frequently..
Not unlike other Christians, they are seeking to live out their love and life God's way, a union between two alone, male and female, under God, for life..not just for them but their children..
Everyone gets blessed in this..
When you can come back and do what he and his Bride and many Christians seek to do, live a life love and marriage unto God and by His standard alone, then you have room to speak..on these things..From your contributions here, thus far, you havent..
'Til that time you are another Liberal doing things in a half-baked, ammoral and unwholesome, not-ideal way..while shouting to all who will hear how "grande" and wonderful your corrupt, or compromised way of life is..
Mr. Pitt and Ms. Jolie are role models for no one..and surely not when it comes to families..
They might come close to being role models for cosmetics, plastic surgeons, tatoos, perversions, new-age gurus, tight clothing, Calvin Klein jeans..
But, what is that, really??
Mr. Pitt needs to pull up his pants, shave his face, buy Ms. Jolie a proper upper undergarment or two, and marry her..
Fish or cut bait..otherwise you are extoling the virtue of two selfish, childish, somewhat egotistic and adulterous presumptuous parties..
Mostly presuming having a child together makes them "marriage's" moral authoritys or spokesmen, they aren't..
Never. were.
|
|
Let me just add a thing to restate what I said about Brad Pitt above..
"Mr. Pitt needs be a man, pull up his pants, shave his face, buy Ms. Jolie a proper upper undergarment or two, and marry her.."
But not necessarily in that order hehe :-)
|
|
Either that or, he/Mr. Pitt, should repent to God of the mess he's made and been in, run to his Wife-Jennifer Aniston- and fall at her feet asking for undying forgiveness and restitution.
(In so doing he can make things right with the woman God had him wed-and finally, with her, walk together away...)
Since he has engaged in a thing God hates, divorce, it may be hard for him to go to the woman God intended for him. Now that he has adulterated his marriage-and with another child by another person no less, those things may-or may not-be mute...
In any case-Mr. Pitt and Ms. Jolie have done many parties wrong in this scenario..not just their-various-children..
They have flagrantly, and most selfishly, shunned the vows God gave them (Mr. Pitt for Miss Aniston) by Mr. Pitt's falling for a harlot (Ms. Jolie) as it were...
They have sullied their reputations, if they ever had them, as fair, kind or decent people. Instead, each acting like a renegade child...
They, (Ms. Jolie), have used their wiles and flesh to peddle their wares up in front of married men who really shouldn’t have ever had to do with them...
They (Mr. Pitt) have succumbed to a strange woman (Jolie) and has become effectively, as the Bible calls it "a crust of bread"...
There is nothing noble, righteous or decent in what they have done...
In doing what they have done-plus the accompanying fornication, having a child together out of wedlock, they have not only consented to participating in the WORST kind of contempt
(Hatred of God's will and lawlessness about his holy covenant), they have broken many hearts along the way.
I really don't follow such tabloid stories, but it becomes more gruesome when such featured parties seek to speak out as role models...
They are people who do evil and wipe off their mouths saying "I have done nothing wrong"...
They are hard hearted and mostly hard to the right and God and His ways...
It is not being unkind or judgmental to say these things...
What Miss Jolie has done, for all her philanthropic dreams, has adulterated a family in a way that was never meant to be...
There is nothing romantic in that...
There is nothing pure, lovely or virtuous in such a thing..
I daresay, it is not even a 'sexy' thing, but, spiritually, befitting those old hags that are hidden deep inside those swaying seemingly sensuous female figures in Disney's "Fantasia"...
Absolutely Wicked...
As resolute as treachery.
As "precious" as sin,
as "beautiful" as a lie...
|
|
|